Open Source Grant Management Software: Options and Trade-Offs
Which open source grant management projects are maintained in 2026, their licenses and latest releases, what self-hosting involves, and when a hosted tool is the better fit.

In this article (10)
- Quick Answer: Is There Open Source Grant Management Software?
- Open Source Grant Management Systems Maintained in 2026
- Hypha: Submission Management for Funding Programs
- CiviGrant and the CiviCRM Funding Program Manager
- Outbound Funds on Salesforce
- Open Source Projects to Rule Out
- What Self-Hosting Grant Software Involves
- Small Nonprofit Grant Management Software: Open Source vs Hosted
- FAQ
- Check the Release History Before You Install Anything
Open source grant management software exists, and some of it is actively maintained, but the maintained projects are built for organizations that give grants. A nonprofit looking for a free, self-hosted way to track the grants it applies for will not find one among them.
The other trade-off is labor. Open source code costs nothing to license, but someone has to run the server, apply each release, back up the database and answer for the security of applicant data. For a funder with technical staff that can be a good trade. For a small nonprofit with no IT help it rarely is.
Quick Answer: Is There Open Source Grant Management Software?
Open source grant management software exists, but the maintained projects serve funders. Hypha (BSD-3-Clause), CiviCRM (AGPL-3.0) with its CiviGrant extension, and the CiviCRM Funding Program Manager (AGPL-3.0) manage funding programs for organizations that give money. Each was updated in August or September 2026, while Kuali Coeus's public repository was last updated in 2018 (GitHub, September 2026).
Choosing grant software? Compare GrantCue's plans with the alternatives. See plans and pricing
Open Source Grant Management Systems Maintained in 2026
The open source grant management systems with 2026 releases are Hypha and the CiviCRM family (GitHub, September 2026). A Salesforce app, Outbound Funds, last shipped a release in April 2025, and older projects such as Kuali Coeus and the Frappe Non Profit module are no longer maintained in public (GitHub, September 2026).
Source: project documentation and GitHub repositories, read September 2026.
Hypha, CiviGrant, the Funding Program Manager and Outbound Funds all serve the funder side: Hypha takes in applications, CiviGrant records grants going out, the Funding Program Manager runs a program through to payout, and Outbound Funds manages funds an organization awards. Simpler.Grants.gov touches applicants only because it rebuilds the federal Grants.gov site; it is not a tracker you install for your own pipeline.
Read the status column before the feature list. Hypha shows a recent release and commits on the day it was checked, which is what active maintenance looks like. The Funding Program Manager ships releases but labels itself "dev," a warning to test it before money depends on it. Outbound Funds describes itself as "a community developed and maintained Open Source Commons project," yet its latest release dates from April 11, 2025 (GitHub, September 2026), so look at recent activity before you adopt it.

Hypha: Submission Management for Funding Programs
Hypha is "an open source submission management platform to receive and manage applications for funding, programs, or other resources," developed by the Open Technology Fund and released under "a BSD 3-clause license" (Hypha documentation, September 2026).
It is self-hosted and built with "Django, htmx, PostgreSQL and Wagtail" (Hypha documentation, September 2026), so running it means operating a Django web application and a PostgreSQL database on a server you control.
The project is active. Release v6.7.0 was published on September 14, 2026, and the repository received commits on September 22, 2026 (GitHub, HyphaApp/hypha, September 2026). That activity is good for fixes and features, and it is also a standing job: whoever hosts Hypha has to test and apply each release.
Hypha suits a funder that runs open calls and has, or can hire, someone comfortable administering a web application. It does not track grants an organization applies for. A funder that takes applications also has to check who is applying, and the steps for verifying a nonprofit before granting apply whatever intake software you choose.
CiviGrant and the CiviCRM Funding Program Manager
CiviGrant is a CiviCRM extension designed for organizations that distribute funds to others, such as foundations and grant givers, and it tracks money going out of the organization (CiviCRM User Guide, September 2026). CiviCRM's core is licensed AGPL-3.0 (GitHub, civicrm/civicrm-core, September 2026).
"As of CiviCRM version 5.46, CiviGrant ships as an extension which can be enabled from the extensions screen" (CiviCRM User Guide, September 2026). CiviCRM's most recent tag, 6.18.1, points to a commit dated September 17, 2026 (GitHub, civicrm/civicrm-core, September 2026). The fit is narrow and useful: a funder that already keeps its contacts in CiviCRM can record the grants it makes in the same database, without adding a second system.
The CiviCRM Funding Program Manager goes further. The extension, published in the systopia/funding repository, lets organizations "manage funding programs from application to payout," is AGPL-3.0 according to its info.xml file, published release 0.31.0 on August 18, 2026, and marks its own development stage as "dev" (GitHub, systopia/funding, September 2026). Treat it as a project to pilot, not one to run a live payout cycle on without testing.
Both tools sit on the funder side. Neither is meant for tracking the grants an organization applies for.
Outbound Funds on Salesforce
Outbound Funds is "a customizable foundation for managing funds awarded by your organization, like grants, scholarships or internal funding," released under the BSD-3-Clause license as "a community developed and maintained Open Source Commons project" (GitHub, SalesforceFoundation/OutboundFundsModule, September 2026).
It installs through install.salesforce.org and runs inside Salesforce, so there is no server to host, but there is a Salesforce org to administer. Its latest release, 1.32, was published on April 11, 2025 (GitHub, September 2026).
The platform cost depends on Salesforce. "Through the Power of Us Program any eligible nonprofit receives 10 Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud Core licenses, at no cost" (Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud Pricing FAQ, October 2026). Salesforce's own funder product, Nonprofit Cloud for Grantmaking, lists one edition, Max, at "$ 285 USD/User/Month (Billed annually)," and "These editions require an annual contract" (Salesforce, Nonprofit Cloud for Grantmaking Pricing, October 2026). The same page lists the base Nonprofit Cloud editions at $70 (Sales & Service Core) and $125 (Sales & Service Advanced) per user per month, billed annually (Salesforce, Nonprofit Cloud for Grantmaking Pricing, October 2026). Outbound Funds is the free community code on the same platform, with Salesforce administration as the price of entry.
Open Source Projects to Rule Out
Three public projects look like grant software but should be ruled out for running a grant program in 2026: Kuali Coeus, whose public code has not been updated since 2018; the archived Frappe Non Profit module; and Simpler.Grants.gov, which modernizes the federal Grants.gov site (GitHub, September 2026).
Kuali Coeus is the clearest case. The public kuali/kc repository, licensed AGPL-3.0, was last pushed on May 16, 2018, and its latest GitHub release, coeus-6.0.1, dates from March 16, 2015 (GitHub, kuali/kc, September 2026). Kuali's research administration product today is Kuali Research, which Kuali describes as "a suite of connected modules on one platform" (Kuali, Research Administration page, September 2026).
The Frappe Non Profit module (frappe/non_profit, GPL-3.0) contains a grant_application record type, but it is archived on GitHub and was last pushed on July 12, 2024 (GitHub, September 2026).
Simpler.Grants.gov is "A modernization effort for Grants.gov" run by HHS. Its code is public domain in the United States with a CC0 1.0 worldwide waiver, and release 2026.09.16-1 shipped on September 16, 2026 (GitHub, HHS/simpler-grants-gov, September 2026). The project is active, but it rebuilds the federal site, and it is not a grant tracker for applicants.

What Self-Hosting Grant Software Involves
Self-hosting grant software means your organization runs the application, its database and its security, so the real cost is staff time for installation, upgrades, backups, email delivery and access control, plus the legal duties that come with storing applicant data.
Federal money adds duties. A funder that makes subawards of federal funds is a pass-through entity, and recipients and subrecipients must "Take reasonable cybersecurity and other measures to safeguard information including protected personally identifiable information (PII) and other types of information" (2 CFR 200.303(e), eCFR, current as of September 2026). They must also "retain all Federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report" (2 CFR 200.334, eCFR, current as of September 2026), so a self-hosted system has to keep those records at least that long.
Licenses differ from project to project, so read each project's license file before your team modifies or redistributes the code.
Count the people, too. Self-hosting works when a named person owns upgrades and backups, with a second person who can step in. Without that, a self-hosted system falls behind on releases.
Open source does answer one risk that vendor-owned products carry: retirement. Ireland's Health Research Board says it loses access to the data and functions of its grant system, Grant Tracker, after the provider's planned December 31, 2026 sunset (HRB tender notice, December 19, 2025). Code you host under an open license stays runnable after its maintainers move on, though fixes stop.
Adoption costs time on any new system, open source or not. One commenter in a Reddit thread said "a spreadsheet was so much easier... yet another thing I'd have to log into to get to my work" (Reddit thread 1wiivcd, read September 2026). Budget for training, and retire the old spreadsheet on a set date so the team has one place to work.

Small Nonprofit Grant Management Software: Open Source vs Hosted
A small nonprofit that applies for grants will not find an applicant-side tracker among the maintained open source projects, so its realistic options are a spreadsheet, a general database tool with a free plan, or a hosted grant tracker with a free or low-cost plan. Funders have more open source choice, and some hosted grantmaking tools publish prices to compare against. For the applicant side, our review of grant management software for nonprofits compares hosted trackers by the job they do and what they cost.
GrantHub is no longer an option. Instrumentl wrote that "GrantHub is shutting down on January 31, 2026," and IGX Solutions wrote that "Both the original GrantHub and GrantHub Pro packages will be sunsetted and discontinued by January 31, 2026" (Instrumentl, GrantHub migration page, September 2026; IGX Solutions blog, June 11, 2025). None of the maintained open source projects replaces it on the applicant side; see this list of GrantHub alternatives.
A spreadsheet works until reminders and change history matter. One commenter in a Reddit thread counted "reminders, automations" among the features a team gains by moving past Excel (Reddit thread 1vydvxu, read October 2026). Another thread held two lines worth repeating: "my organization has had about 400 versions of a grant tracker" and "what they want is a database, not a spreadsheet" (Reddit thread 1qx3lpf, read September 2026). A spreadsheet laid out for grant tracking is a sound start while those limits do not bite, and grant research tools with a free tier cover the search side at no cost.
GrantCue is a hosted option for the applicant side, the side the maintained open source projects leave uncovered. Its Free plan costs $0 a month for 1 user, with up to 10 grants tracked at once, search across every source GrantCue covers, a pipeline board, reminders, a calendar feed for deadlines, CSV and Excel import and export, post-award budgets and 3 AI NOFO summaries a month (grantcue.com pricing page, October 2026). There is no server to run: "Data is encrypted in transit with TLS and at rest by our database host," and sign-in supports "TOTP-based 2FA" (grantcue.com features page, October 2026). Former GrantHub users who saved a CSV can import it from Settings, Import, then review the field mapping and the imported records; the limits of each plan are on the pricing page. GrantCue makes one of the products compared in this post, so check the figures yourself: each one names its public source and a date.
FAQ
Is There an Open Source Grant Management System for Small Nonprofits?
Not for the grants a small nonprofit applies for. The maintained open source projects, Hypha, CiviCRM with CiviGrant, and the CiviCRM Funding Program Manager, all serve organizations that give money out (project documentation and GitHub, September 2026). A small applicant is better served by a spreadsheet, a general database tool with a free plan, or a hosted tracker with a free tier.
Is There an Open Source GrantHub Alternative?
Not among the maintained projects. GrantHub was discontinued on January 31, 2026, as Instrumentl and IGX Solutions reported (Instrumentl, GrantHub migration page, September 2026), and the open source projects with 2026 releases are funder tools. The practical replacements are hosted trackers and spreadsheets. Keep any records you exported in CSV form, so whichever replacement you pick can import them.
Why Would a Funder Choose Open Source Grant Management Software?
For control and cost. A self-hosted system such as Hypha, released under a BSD 3-clause license, keeps applicant data on servers the funder runs (Hypha documentation, September 2026). Open source code carries no license fee, and a funder can adapt it to its own program. The trade is staff time: installation, every upgrade, backups, security and email delivery fall to the funder or a contractor it pays.
How Does Open Source Compare With Hosted Grant Software on Cost?
Open source code has no license fee, but hosting and staff time are real costs. Some hosted grantmaking tools publish prices: Good Grants lists Intro at "$3,950 USD Annual cost" and Premium at "$7,900 USD Annual cost" (Good Grants pricing page, September 2026), and Fluxx lists Grantmaker "starting at $13,000 per year plus a one-time setup fee" (Fluxx demo page FAQ, July 25, 2026). Compare those with a year of your own staff hours.
Can You Manage Grants Without Grant Management Software?
Yes, while the list stays small. A spreadsheet or a free database tool can hold opportunities, deadlines and awards. Airtable's Free plan allows 1,000 records per base and up to 5 editors or creators, and at the cap Airtable says "you will not be able to add more records or attachments until you upgrade to a new plan," though it will "never remove your data" (Airtable support and pricing pages, September 2026).
Check the Release History Before You Install Anything
Before you commit to any open source grant tool, open its repository and check the date of the latest release, whether commits are still arriving, and the license file. Hypha's release on September 14, 2026 and CiviCRM's tag pointing to a September 17, 2026 commit pass that test; Kuali Coeus, last pushed on May 16, 2018, does not (GitHub, September 2026).
Then price a year of hosting and staff time against the hosted tools with published prices, and pick the route your team can keep running and keep secure.