← Back to blog

Do Funders Fund Salaries? Including Staff Time in a Grant Budget

Do funders fund salaries? Federal awards and foundations both pay program staff, with limits on admin pay. How to show salaries, fringe and admin time in a grant budget.

A budget document with one highlighted section beside a small clock and calendar

In this article (11)

Do funders fund salaries? Yes, and you can include staff time in a grant budget. Salaries and wages for work tied to the award are normal direct costs when you show who did the work, what share of time went to the project, and how the pay rate was set; administrative salaries follow stricter rules.

Personnel lines get accepted when each role ties to an objective and the math stays visible. Each staff line shows role, time share, pay basis, and the fringe that follows salary, with admin time charged direct only when it meets the federal test.

Quick Answer: Do Funders Fund Salaries?

Do funders fund salaries? Yes: federal awards treat staff time on the award as a direct cost, and foundation project grants, which are mostly restricted to program expenses, can cover program staff. Admin and executive salaries differ: federal rules normally treat them as indirect, and foundations that pay them do so through an indirect rate or general operating support.

Do Funders Fund Salaries? Federal Awards and Foundations

Funders do pay salaries, but which salaries, and on which line, depends on the funder. The split that matters is between staff who do the funded work and staff who run the organization.

Federal awards pay program staff as a direct cost. Costs charged directly "are typically incurred specifically for that Federal award (including, for example, supplies needed to achieve the award's objectives and the proportion of employee compensation and fringe benefits expended in relation to that specific award)" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(b), current as of September 2026). Administrative and clerical salaries are the exception, treated as indirect unless they pass a three-part test, and executive and accounting salaries are named among typical nonprofit indirect costs (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c) and 200.414(b), current as of September 2026).

Foundations pay salaries mostly inside program grants. Candid's readiness guidance says most grants, especially first-time grants, are restricted to program expenses, and that general operating or unrestricted grants "are largely the exception, rather than the rule" (Candid, March 2024). Program staff fit inside that restriction; administrative salaries usually reach a foundation budget through an indirect rate. The Ford Foundation, for example, defines indirect costs as shared expenditures, giving "the organization's accounting department, technology department, or office of their chief executives" as examples (Ford Foundation FAQs, published November 1, 2022).

SalaryFederal awards (2 CFR 200)Foundation grants
Program staff doing the funded workDirect cost in proportion to effort, 200.413(b)A program expense; check the guidelines for any cap
Administrative and clerical staffNormally indirect; direct only if integral, identified and not also recovered as indirect, 200.413(c)Through the funder's indirect rate or general operating support
Executive, accounting and personnel staffTypical nonprofit indirect costs, 200.414(b)Through the indirect rate where the funder pays one
Fringe benefitsFollow salary in the same pattern, 200.431(c)Set by the funder's budget form

Source: eCFR 2 CFR part 200, current as of September 2026; Candid (March 2024); Ford Foundation FAQs (November 2022).

Whether a particular foundation pays admin and indirect costs at all, and at what rate, is the subject of does a funder fund admin and indirect costs; this page stays with how to put staff time on the page.

Grant Budget Rules for Staff Costs

Every staff cost in a grant budget has to be allowable, allocable to the award in proportion to the benefit it receives, and treated the same way in every budget you submit. These tests come from the federal cost principles, and the guide to the Uniform Guidance in plain English shows where they sit in 2 CFR 200.

Direct cost is a cost category that covers inputs identified specifically with one award. The federal definition states that "Direct costs are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as a Federal award, or other internally or externally funded activity, or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(a), current as of September 2026).

Allowability sits above every line. 2 CFR 200.403 lists the eight criteria a cost must meet to be allowable, beginning with "(a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.403, current as of September 2026). A reasonable cost is one that "does not exceed an amount that a prudent person would incur under the circumstances prevailing when the decision was made to incur the cost" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.404, current as of September 2026). Compensation must also be "reasonable for the services rendered" and follow the organization's written policy, applied consistently to federal and nonfederal work (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1), current as of September 2026).

Allocability decides the share. The standard states that "A cost is allocable to a Federal award or other cost objective if the cost is assignable to that Federal award or other cost objective in accordance with the relative benefits received" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.405(a), current as of September 2026). A coordinator working half time on the project supports a half-time charge. Where the mix cannot be separated cleanly, keep a written basis that shows how benefit was judged.

Keep one home for each staff cost. A cost "must not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.403(d), current as of September 2026). Keep payroll records tied to actual work.

How to Show Staff Time in a Grant Budget

A staff line works when it shows the role, the time share, the pay rate basis, and the math, so a reviewer can check the total without asking for backup.

The federal text confirms staff time as a direct line when it serves the award. It provides that costs charged directly "are typically incurred specifically for that Federal award (including, for example, supplies needed to achieve the award's objectives and the proportion of employee compensation and fringe benefits expended in relation to that specific award)" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(b), current as of September 2026).

Start with program roles. Name each role, the award share, and the period. Percentage records are permitted, since records "may reflect categories of activities expressed as a percentage distribution of total activities" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(viii), current as of September 2026).

One commenter on Reddit advised "one dated input table with employee ID, grant, percentage, effective start/end date, and who approved the change" (Reddit thread 1vmiey8, read September 2026). Summed by employee each pay period, that table tests the federal cap that payroll records must "Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the recipient or subrecipient, not exceeding 100 percent of compensated activities" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(iii), current as of September 2026).

Fringe benefits "are allowances and services employers provide to their employees as compensation in addition to regular salaries and wages" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.431(a), current as of September 2026). Allocate benefits the way salary is allocated. Leave costs are allowed only where "They are provided under established written leave policies," "The costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards," and the cash-or-accrual basis chosen "is consistently followed" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.431(b), current as of September 2026). More worked lines appear in the grant proposal budget guide.

Two document columns linked by arrows to a central sheet, one with program icons and one with office icons

A Personnel Table Built From Staff Time

A personnel table with staff time puts program salaries first, fringe second, and directly charged admin time on its own line with a note explaining why it qualifies.

RoleAnnual salaryAward shareMonthsCharged to the awardWhy the line exists
Project director$85,00020 percent12$17,000Leadership and milestone delivery
Program coordinator$52,00075 percent12$39,000Sessions, intake, partner follow-up
Data associate$48,00025 percent12$12,000Measure collection and reporting
Administrative assistant$42,00010 percent12$4,200Award-specific scheduling and filing, justified as a direct charge
Salary subtotal$72,200
Fringe at 22 percent of charged salary$15,884Leave, employee insurance, pensions, unemployment benefits
Total personnel$88,084

Illustrative figures, not data from a real organization.

Every number in that table is derived, not asserted. A reviewer can multiply annual salary by the award share and by the months covered divided by 12, and land on the same figure, which is the point: the arithmetic is the justification.

Program staff are the easy case. Their hours exist because the award exists, so the charge follows the benefit. Admin and clerical pay is different. The rule states that "Administrative and clerical staff salaries should normally be treated as indirect costs," and allows direct charging only if the services are "integral to a Federal award," the individuals "can be specifically identified with a Federal award," and "The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c), current as of September 2026).

That means an admin line needs a sentence tying the person to award tasks beyond general office support. Scheduling project sessions, maintaining award files, and preparing award reports can qualify when they are integral to the award and tracked to it. General reception and general bookkeeping usually stay indirect, since typical indirect for nonprofits "may include depreciation on buildings and equipment, the costs of operating and maintaining facilities, and general administration and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.414(b), current as of September 2026).

Shared staff across grants need a clean split, and allocating salaries across multiple grants walks through the method. Where proportions can be set without heavy effort, the cost "must be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.405(d), current as of September 2026). Never move salary between awards to fill a gap, since "A cost allocable to a particular Federal award may not be charged to other Federal awards (for example, to overcome fund deficiencies or to avoid restrictions imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal awards)" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.405(c), current as of September 2026).

Sample Budget Narrative for Grant Proposal Staff Lines

A sample budget narrative for grant proposal staff lines turns each personnel row into two or three sentences that a reviewer can follow without opening another file.

Open each staff paragraph with duties tied to the work plan, consistent with the allowability rule at 2 CFR 200.403 (eCFR 2 CFR 200.403, current as of September 2026). Then state the salary basis, the award share, and the months covered, then the line total. Percentage distributions are acceptable here too (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(viii), current as of September 2026).

Fringe gets one sentence per role group. Name whether the rate is entity-wide or itemized, then state that benefits follow salary in the same pattern (eCFR 2 CFR 200.431(c) and (d), current as of September 2026).

Admin time needs a longer justification. State what makes the service integral, name the person and the award tasks, and confirm the cost is not also recovered as indirect (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c), current as of September 2026). Close with the record habit. Charges must be "based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1), current as of September 2026). The budget narrative example in the grant proposal budget guide shows the same pattern for other lines.

Two staff members comparing printed sheets against a laptop at a shared desk

Documenting Staff Time After the Award

An Excel budget template helps at submission, but the records that protect staff charges are built after the award starts.

Budget estimates alone do not support payroll charges. The rule states that "Budget estimates (meaning, estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes" under three stated conditions (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vii), current as of September 2026).

Collect time records that show what each person did by award. Check that each person's allocations never exceed 100 percent of compensated activities (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(iii), current as of September 2026).

The dated allocation table earns its effective-date column here. Another commenter in that Reddit discussion named the pressure behind it: grant periods "starting and ending on different dates is the actual hard part" (Reddit thread 1vmiey8, read September 2026). A share that was right in March is wrong in July when one award closes and another opens, and the record has to show the date the share changed.

Interim estimates need after-the-fact review. Controls must "include processes to perform periodic after-the-fact reviews of interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates," with "All necessary adjustments … made so that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(vii)(C), current as of September 2026).

Hourly nonexempt staff need daily hours. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, "charges for the salaries and wages of nonexempt employees … must also be supported by records indicating the total number of hours worked each day" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(3), current as of September 2026). The federal compliance checklist and our post-award setup list carry the same discipline.

Record habitWhat it provesHow often
Timesheet or percent distribution by awardWork performed by person and objectiveEach pay period
Dated allocation table with approverShare per grant and effective datesWhen shares change, plus a per-period check
After-the-fact review and adjustmentFinal charge is accurate, allowable and properly allocatedOn the periodic schedule your written procedures set
Daily hours for nonexempt staffTotal hours worked each dayDaily
Cost share time fileMatch hours meet the same standard as charged hours, 2 CFR 200.430(g)(4)Each period claimed

Staff time used as match follows the same rule, and the federal grant match requirements guide covers the rest of cost sharing. None of these habits is a prescribed federal form. The Uniform Guidance does not mandate a monthly timesheet or a semi-annual certification, and records that meet the 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1) standards need no additional support for the work performed (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(2), current as of September 2026).

What Funders Accept on Staff Lines

A free downloadable template settles formatting. Funder acceptance turns on whether the role is needed, whether the share is credible, and whether the records will hold.

Program time tied to objectives usually passes without debate. Admin time passes only when integral, identified, and not double-recovered, as set at 2 CFR 200.413(c) (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c), current as of September 2026).

Staff choices affect the indirect line too. Recipients and subrecipients without a current federally negotiated rate "may elect to charge a de minimis rate of up to 15 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC)" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.414(f), current as of September 2026), and that base includes "all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.1, current as of September 2026), so each staff dollar charged to the award also carries the rate. The MTDC base and the indirect cost rate for federal grants are covered in their own guides.

Keep each staff type in one home. The de minimis rule requires that "When applying the de minimis rate, costs must be consistently charged as either direct or indirect costs and may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.414(f), current as of September 2026).

Foundation terms vary, so read the guidelines. MacArthur's policy is to provide indirect cost recovery of 29 percent of project costs on all project grants (MacArthur Foundation Indirect Cost Policy, updated October 3, 2024), and the Ford Foundation states that "As of January 1, 2023, the Ford Foundation will pay a minimum indirect cost rate (IDC) of 25% for eligible project grants" (Ford Foundation FAQs, published November 1, 2022). Use the funder template when one exists and keep the same role logic inside it.

Stacked paper layers with small people icons and shield shapes

Budget Proposal for a Grant: Staff Time Review Checklist

Staff lines hold up in review when salary, fringe, allocation and records tell one story. Run each personnel line through these checks before the budget goes out.

CheckRule behind it
Each role ties to an objective in the work plan2 CFR 200.403(a), necessary and reasonable
Pay follows the written compensation policy2 CFR 200.430(a)(1)
The award share matches planned effort, and no one exceeds 100 percent of compensated activities2 CFR 200.405(a) and 200.430(g)(1)(iii)
Fringe follows salary in the same pattern2 CFR 200.431(c)
Admin lines are integral, identified and not also recovered as indirect2 CFR 200.413(c)
No staff cost appears as both direct and indirect2 CFR 200.403(d)

Source: eCFR, 2 CFR part 200, current as of September 2026.

Once the award starts, these personnel lines become the plan that actual payroll is measured against. For that comparison, GrantCue holds post-award budgets and payment schedules on every plan, Free included, and its Organization plan, at $229 a month, adds a read-only QuickBooks Online spend import mapped to grant budgets (GrantCue pricing page, October 2026). The GrantCue features page describes the post-award budget tracking.

FAQ

Can You Include Staff Time in a Grant Budget?

Yes. Staff time belongs in a grant budget when the work is necessary for the award, charged in proportion to the benefit received, and backed by records of work performed. Program staff time is an ordinary direct cost. Admin and clerical time is direct only when integral to the award, specifically identified with it, and not also recovered as indirect (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c), current as of September 2026).

How Do You Set Up a Grant Budget Template in Excel for Staff Time?

Check the announcement first: one commenter on Reddit noted that "the funding agency usually has a budget justification template they'll want used" (Reddit thread 1p2f7cl, read September 2026). If no template is required, build a workbook with one tab for personnel by role and share, one tab for nonpersonnel lines, and one tab for the narrative logic. Keep formulas open so a reviewer can trace each line total to its basis.

How Much Staff Time Can a Grant Budget Carry?

As much as the work plan needs and the records support, up to each person's full compensated activity: no one's shares across awards and other work may exceed 100 percent (eCFR 2 CFR 200.430(g)(1)(iii), current as of September 2026). For each role, name the award share and duration, give the pay basis, and attach fringe the same way salary is allocated, so a reviewer can check necessity, reasonableness and allocability from the page alone.

What Should a Grant Budget Include?

A grant budget should include direct program salaries with time shares, allocable fringe benefits, supplies, travel, contractual help, and allocable indirect where allowed, with each line tied to an objective. Admin and clerical time belongs as a direct line only when the service is integral, identified to the award, and not also recovered as indirect. Everything else in that group stays indirect.

What Is a Simple Budget Template for a Grant Proposal?

A simple template is two tables. The personnel table lists each role with annual salary, award share, months covered and the amount charged, followed by fringe at your policy rate. The second table holds every other line by category, with a total and one sentence per line saying what the money buys. That is enough for a single-period request with no required form.

What Is a Sample Budget Narrative for a Grant Proposal?

A sample staff narrative gives each role two or three sentences covering duties, time share, pay basis and line total, plus one fringe sentence per group. Admin roles get an added justification sentence that tracks the integral, identified and not double-recovered test. The narrative should let each line stand alone if lifted from the page.

Which Staff Costs Usually Stay Indirect?

General reception, general bookkeeping, executive salaries and personnel administration usually do, since typical nonprofit indirect costs include "general administration and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting" (eCFR 2 CFR 200.414(b), current as of September 2026). An admin role moves to a direct line only when its service is integral to the award, identified to it, and not also recovered as indirect (eCFR 2 CFR 200.413(c), current as of September 2026).

A Staff Budget That Holds Up in Review

Build the personnel section from roles tied to objectives, shares tied to benefit, fringe tied to salary, and records tied to actual work. That chain answers necessity, reasonableness, allocability and documentation in one pass. File the dated allocation table each period. Run the after-the-fact review. Keep admin justifications with the award file.